Facebook Linkedin Instagram
Nihang Law Professional Corporation Logo
CILA-Logo-Bi-White-pr
law-society-ontario-1
cba-logo.jpeg-1-1
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Instagram
H&C Grounds Cannot Waive a Public Policy Condition: What That May Mean for Your Application

31st July 2026BY Qasim Nihang

H&C Grounds Cannot Waive a Public Policy Condition: What That May Mean for Your Application

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every legal situation is unique — consult a licensed lawyer before making any legal decisions.

Quick Answer

The short answer

A humanitarian and compassionate (H&C) request cannot excuse a condition that the Minister wrote into a temporary public policy. Section 25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act lets an officer consider H&C factors when an applicant does not meet a requirement of the Act or the Regulations, and a public policy issued under section 25.2 forms part of neither. IRCC operational guidance published on July 22, 2026 directs officers to refuse a public policy application where the applicant asks for H&C consideration to overcome an unmet condition, and to identify in the refusal exactly which requirement was not met. No separate H&C decision is issued on that application. An applicant in this position may file a new permanent residence application on H&C grounds, with the applicable fees payable again.

Why This Rule Catches Applicants Off Guard

Most people who ask for humanitarian and compassionate consideration are not trying to bend the rules. They could have a Canadian-born child, a health condition, or years of settled life here, and they could reasonably assume these circumstances count for something.

Canadian immigration law does contain a compassion provision, and it has helped many families. What it does not reach is a condition written inside a temporary public policy. That may still catch out even someone who understands what an H&C application involves, because nothing on the form explains it. Guidance published by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) on July 22, 2026 now sets the limit for officers.

25(1)The provision under which a humanitarian and compassionate request may be made
25.2The provision under which the Minister may create a temporary public policy
2(2)Defines what the Act takes in, and places public policies outside it
22 Jul 2026Date IRCC published the operational guidance discussed here

Quick Start: Pick Your Path

Where you are in the process changes which part of this article matters most.

You have not applied yet

Read the policy conditions line by line before filing, and check that every document the policy names is in your package. A gap is cheapest to fix here.

Your application is filed and waiting

If you suspect a condition may not be met, adding a compassion letter typically does not change the outcome of that application. Advice now may be worth more than a letter.

You have a refusal letter in hand

Go to the roadmap further down this page. The letter should specify the requirement that was not met, which then shapes every option that follows.

You were included as a family member

Accompanying family members are assessed individually against the policy conditions. Therefore, a refusal may affect your file even where your circumstances differ from the principal applicant's.

What a Ministerial Public Policy Is and How It Differs From the Act

A temporary public policy is a time-limited immigration measure created by the Minister under section 25.2 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. It sets its own eligibility conditions for a defined group of people. It is not part of the Act and not part of the Regulations, and that difference decides what an officer may waive.

IRCC is the federal department that decides these applications, and its rules come from more than one place. The Act is the statute passed by Parliament, and the Regulations sit underneath it and fill in the detail. Under section 2(2), the word Act takes in the Regulations and Ministerial Instructions made under section 14.1(1).

A public policy sits outside all of that. The Minister may create a public policy to open a route for a group of people in similar circumstances, usually for a limited time period, with the conditions written into the policy text itself. Applicants and accompanying family members are each assessed against those conditions. Most other permanent residence pathways are built on the Act and Regulations instead.

Nihang Law Professional Corporation
What an H&C request may reach, and what it may not
The same words carry different weight depending on which authority the requirement comes from. That difference decides what an officer may waive.
H&C may apply
Requirement of the Act or the Regulations
Where it comes from
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, or the Regulations made under it.
The authority behind it
Passed by Parliament. Under section 2(2), the Act takes in the Regulations and Ministerial Instructions made under section 14.1(1).
May an officer consider an H&C exemption?
Yes. Section 25(1) allows a written humanitarian and compassionate request, and in most cases that request must be considered.
If the requirement is not met
An officer may weigh the humanitarian and compassionate factors put forward before deciding the application.
H&C does not reach it
Condition inside a temporary public policy
Where it comes from
A temporary public policy created by the Minister under section 25.2.
The authority behind it
Set by the Minister. A public policy is not part of the Act and not part of the Regulations.
May an officer consider an H&C exemption?
No. Officers hold no authority to grant an exemption from a condition the Minister set in a public policy.
If the condition is not met
The application is typically refused, and the refusal identifies which requirement was not met.
Both columns describe the same request. What changes is where the unmet requirement comes from, and that is what decides whether an officer has the power to look at it at all.
Source: IRCC operational guidance, H&C considerations: In-Canada PR granting public policies where H&C requests were also made, 22 July 2026, read with the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, ss. 2(2), 14.1(1), 25(1) and 25.2 · Nihang Law Professional Corporation · Law Society of Ontario

Why an Officer Cannot Waive a Condition the Minister Set

An officer's authority to consider humanitarian and compassionate factors comes from section 25(1) of the Act, and it reaches requirements of the Act and the Regulations. Conditions inside a public policy are neither, so an officer holds no power to exempt an applicant from them, however sympathetic the circumstances may be.

This is a question of authority rather than sympathy. An officer may accept that the circumstances are genuinely difficult and still have no lawful route to set aside a condition the Minister wrote.

The guidance published on July 22, 2026 does not create the limit. It states for officers what already followed from how the two provisions are drafted, which is worth knowing if you have seen coverage calling it a tightening of the rules. Files like these are where Qasim Ali, Principal Lawyer at Nihang Law typically starts by identifying which authority the unmet requirement comes from.

What Happens if You Request H&C Anyway

The application is refused. The guidance directs officers to acknowledge the H&C request in the refusal letter, explain that it cannot overcome the policy conditions, and identify explicitly which requirement was not met. No separate decision on humanitarian and compassionate grounds is issued.

One application produces one decision. Many applicants expect two, assuming a compassion request is assessed on its own track once the main assessment ends. That is not what happens here.

The refusal letter therefore carries more weight than people expect. It should name the requirement that was not met and acknowledge the request that was made. The guidance also directs officers to let refused applicants know that having H&C considerations assessed typically means applying again and paying the applicable fees.

Nihang Law Professional Corporation
How a public policy application carrying an H&C request is typically handled
One application produces one decision. There is no second track running alongside it.
1
Application filed
Filed under the temporary public policy, with a humanitarian and compassionate request attached.
2
Assessed individually
The officer assesses the principal applicant and each accompanying family member against the policy conditions.
3
A condition is not met
One or more of the conditions the Minister set is found not to be satisfied.
4
Refusal issued
The refusal identifies the requirement that was not met and acknowledges the H&C request.
5
No second decision
No separate H&C decision issues. A new standalone application on H&C grounds may be available, with the applicable fees payable again.
No stage on this path carries a timeframe, because processing times vary by policy and by file. The point of the sequence is the shape, not the speed.
Source: IRCC operational guidance, H&C considerations: In-Canada PR granting public policies where H&C requests were also made, 22 July 2026 · Nihang Law Professional Corporation · Law Society of Ontario

When IRCC May Refuse Without Asking You for More Documents

In most cases, an officer who is not satisfied that an applicant meets the policy criteria typically raises the concern and gives the applicant a chance to respond. Where the public policy requires all necessary supporting documentation with the application, the officer may not be required to provide that further opportunity.

Procedural fairness is the principle that applicants affected by a decision typically deserve notice of the concern and a chance to respond to it. In the Canadian immigration process, this often arrives as a letter, sometimes called a procedural fairness letter.

The carve-out runs against what most applicants assume. Where a policy is drafted to require a complete package up front, an incomplete submission may be refused with no request for anything further. That’s why it’s important to read the policy text closely before filing. Our page on judicial reviews and refusals explains what that process involves.

A Refusal Under a Public Policy Is Not a Finding of Inadmissibility

A refusal for failing to meet a policy condition is not a finding that a person is inadmissible to Canada. Inadmissibility findings are made under Division 4 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and carry their own consequences. A policy refusal records that a condition was not met.

The difference is worth noting, because a refusal letter can read like a verdict on a person rather than on an application. Some immigration findings can carry lasting consequences, and misrepresentation in Canadian immigration is the clearest example. An unmet policy condition sits in a different category.

Steps to Take After a Public Policy Refusal

Start with the refusal letter. It should specify the requirement that was not met and acknowledge any humanitarian and compassionate request. Check what it says about your status, then get advice on whether a new H&C application or a Federal Court application may suit your situation.
  1. 1
    Find the requirement the letter names

    Officers are directed to explicitly identify which requirement was not met. Find that part of the letter first, because every option that follows turns on it.

  2. 2
    Check whether your request was acknowledged

    Officers are directed to acknowledge an H&C request and explain that it cannot overcome the policy conditions. If your letter is silent on a request you made, raise that when you seek advice.

  3. 3
    Confirm what the letter does and does not say about you

    Read it for what it states rather than how it feels. A refusal for an unmet condition is not a finding of inadmissibility, and the wording typically makes that clear.

  4. 4
    Check your status and any dates that may apply

    Temporary status, work authorisation, and court timelines each run on their own schedules. Note the date on the letter and seek advice promptly.

  5. 5
    Weigh a new application against judicial review

    These answer different problems. A new H&C application asks IRCC to assess your circumstances, including factors such as how IRCC weighs the best interests of a child. Judicial review asks the Federal Court to examine how the decision was made.

Nihang Law Professional Corporation
Reading your refusal letter: which questions may point where
Three questions to ask of the letter in front of you. Each one narrows what is worth raising with a lawyer. None of them predicts an outcome.
ADoes the letter name a condition of the public policy, or a requirement of the Act or the Regulations?
A condition of the public policy
Section 25(1) does not reach conditions the Minister set under section 25.2. Worth confirming which document the named requirement sits in.
A requirement of the Act or the Regulations
Humanitarian and compassionate consideration may be available for requirements of this kind. Worth raising how the request was treated.
BWas your humanitarian and compassionate request acknowledged in the letter?
Yes, it is acknowledged
The letter should also explain that the request cannot overcome the policy conditions. Worth reading how that reasoning is put.
No, the letter is silent on it
Officers are directed to acknowledge such a request. Its absence is worth noting when you seek advice.
CDoes the letter make any finding that you are inadmissible to Canada?
No finding of inadmissibility
The letter records an unmet condition, which is a different thing from a finding under Division 4. Worth confirming before assuming the worst.
It refers to inadmissibility
Inadmissibility carries its own consequences and its own process. Worth getting advice on that separately and promptly.
Each answer points to something to raise, not to a result. What may be open on any particular file depends on facts this chart cannot see.
Source: IRCC operational guidance, H&C considerations: In-Canada PR granting public policies where H&C requests were also made, 22 July 2026; the explicit identification duty is stated there · Nihang Law Professional Corporation · Law Society of Ontario

Common Mistakes That Lead to a Public Policy Refusal

  • ▸Treating a compassion letter as a safety net for a condition that is not met. It typically does not work that way in a public policy application.
  • ▸Assuming a second, separate H&C decision follows automatically. One application produces one decision.
  • ▸Expecting a letter from IRCC before any refusal. Where a policy requires complete documentation up front, that opportunity may not arise.
  • ▸Reading a refusal as a finding of inadmissibility. The two are different, and the letter usually shows which one you are holding.
  • ▸Filing a new application that repeats the original package. It typically needs to address whatever the refusal identified.
  • ▸Waiting until a deadline is close to seek advice. Some options run on fixed schedules.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I still ask for humanitarian and compassionate consideration if I applied under a public policy?

You can make the request, but an officer deciding a public policy application has no authority to exempt you from the conditions the Minister set in that policy. The request may be acknowledged in the decision and cannot change that result.

Do I get a separate decision on my H&C request?

No. IRCC guidance states that applicants are not entitled to an additional, distinct decision on whether permanent residence may be granted on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, because the only decision being made is on the public policy application itself.

Does IRCC have to warn me before refusing my application?

In most cases, an officer who is not satisfied that you meet the policy criteria typically informs you and gives you a chance to respond. Where the policy requires all supporting documentation to be filed with the application, the officer may not be required to provide that further opportunity.

Does a refused public policy application mean I am inadmissible to Canada?

No. A refusal for failing to meet a policy condition only records that a condition was not met. Inadmissibility is a separate finding made under Division 4 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, and a refusal letter typically clarifies which kind of decision it contains.

Do I have to pay the fees again if I apply on humanitarian grounds?

The guidance directs officers to advise refused applicants that having H&C considerations assessed means applying again for permanent residence on those grounds and paying the applicable fees. Current amounts are published by IRCC and can change.

Does this change affect Express Entry or spousal sponsorship applications?

No. This guidance concerns in-Canada permanent residence applications filed under a temporary public policy. It does not change how humanitarian and compassionate requests are handled in programs built on the Act and Regulations, which our immigration practice covers separately.

Can I challenge the refusal in Federal Court?

An application for leave and judicial review may be available depending on the facts. Judicial review asks the Court to examine how a decision was made rather than to decide the application again. Timelines apply, so early advice is typically useful.

Talk to an Ontario Immigration Lawyer

The compassion provision in Canadian immigration law is real, and it matters, but it reaches requirements of the Act and the Regulations rather than conditions inside a temporary public policy. A refusal on that basis records an unmet condition. It is not a finding about your character, and does not close every door.

If you are holding a refusal letter or weighing an application under a public policy, our team in Toronto and Scarborough helps clients across the GTA think through the options that may still be available.

Contact Nihang Law
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every legal situation is unique — consult a licensed lawyer before making any legal decisions. Nihang Law Professional Corporation is regulated by the Law Society of Ontario.
Qasim Ali — Principal Lawyer at Nihang Law Professional Corporation

About the author

Qasim Ali

Principal Lawyer · Nihang Law Professional Corporation · Toronto & Scarborough, Ontario · Law Society of Ontario

Qasim Ali is the Principal Lawyer at Nihang Law Professional Corporation, serving clients across Toronto, Scarborough, and the broader Greater Toronto Area. He provides full-service legal representation across immigration, real estate, family law, criminal law, civil litigation, employment law, wills and estates, and business law.

Nihang Law is particularly recognized for its depth in immigration and real estate law — a combination that serves newcomers and growing families navigating both legal systems simultaneously.

Sources & References

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Previous Post